Why You Should Read Eunice

Eunice Kennedy Shriver wasn’t perfect, but she was smart, tenacious, and persistent. She never held public office, but she had huge influence on her brothers Jack, Bobby, and Ted, and through them brought about important research and legislation on mental retardation, special education, women and children’s health, and abortion.

If you care anything at all about women’s issues or 20th century history and politics, you should read Eunice’s biography, Eunice: The Kennedy Who Changed the World by Eileen McNamara.

What I liked

Eunice was a fascinating woman, abrupt and terrifically demanding, but also strong willed and undaunted by challenges. She was the privileged daughter of Joe Kennedy, the millionaire, and sister to JFK, RFK, and Edward Kennedy, who each held public office, including president of the United States. Luckily for women and children across this country, Eunice used her power and influence for good.

Her contributions to society include, but are not limited to, the establishment of the Special Olympics program, as well as the overhaul of services provided for children with mental retardation and other disabilities. She also led committees and research teams on issues concerning special education, women’s health, and abortion.

I enjoyed learning about the Kennedy family. They have been highly influential in our country, and yet I knew little about them. Some interesting tid bits I discovered while reading Eunice:

  • Joe Kennedy was a self-made millionaire, earning his fortune in the stock market via insider information (which was, at the time, a legal practice)
  • Joe and Rose Kennedy had NINE children: the well known brothers listed above, as well as a son who died in WWII and five daughters, one of whom had mental retardation and lived most of her life in various institutions
  • John F. Kennedy (“JFK”) had many serious health problems, as did Eunice. I always thought he was a dynamic, energetic, healthy young man!

I enjoyed learning about 20th century America, although some of the things I discovered shocked and horrified me. For example, I wasn’t surprised that people with mental and intellectual disabilities were shuttled away to institutions. However, I was shocked to discover that many people, including CLERGY, regarded people with disabilities as less than human:

In 1968 Joseph Francis Fletcher, an ordained Episcopal priest who taught Christian ethics at Harvard Divinity School, wrote in Atlantic Monthly that there was ‘no reason to feel guilty about putting a Down Syndrome baby away, whether it’s “put away” in the sense of hidden in a sanatorium or in a more responsible lethal sense. … True guilt arises only from an offense against a person, and a Down’s is not a person.” (emphasis added by me)

Fletcher wrote this after it was made public that a baby born with Down’s Syndrome died at Johns Hopkins Hospital after its parents, who were unwilling to raise a child with Down’s Syndrome, opted refused simple surgical treatment of a life-threatening, but easily corrected, obstruction between the child’s stomach and small intestine. The baby was put in a corner and left to die. It took fifteen days.

Whoa. That happened three years before I was born.

Wait, there’s more. Until 1984 it was LEGAL to withhold lifesaving medical treatment from a child born with a disability. That was in my life time. Horrifying. I’m happy to see that we have progressed as a society, although I’m acutely aware that we still have work to do. We still need people like Eunice.

(Humorous side bar of comic relief: After WWII, there was a rise in juvenile delinquency, and politicians, police, and social scientists blamed the disruption of family life caused by the war, as well as comic books and pinball machines for their corrosive influence on youth. Ha! I wonder what those same social scientists would say about iPhones now! )

Eunice is a complex female role model to study. She was confident and unwavering, yet she always deferred to her father, her brothers, and her husband. Upon receiving an honorary doctorate from Santa Clara University, she said,

All of my life I have been taught that men are the dominant sex, that it is men who go to the best colleges, that it is men who make the memorable speeches and run for public office. I therefore congratulate the president and faculty of Santa Clara for striking this new blow for freedom and for equality.

In all her work on public policy regarding women’s health and all the hours she spent helping women who had served time in jail find jobs and security, she kept herself minimalized, marginalized by her woman hood.

Or did she? Perhaps with Eunice’s example, we see that a title isn’t what you need to change the world. It’s spirit.

McNamara makes it clear that Eunice was a driven but scattered woman who needed help to run her household and raise her children. She was often away from home and oblivious to the needs of her children, which is another great example that women cannot do everything for everyone at once. Something has to give. In Eunice’s case, she did great work for society, but she needed assistance with her family. Which is okay. It’s reality. We are human.

What I didn’t like

Eunice rambles. The chapters do not have form or focus. The book is a long winded chronological recap of Eunice’s life, and McNamara jumps from topic to topic (from personal life to public policy) in the tiny space between paragraphs. There are also a LOT of names… politicians, doctors, people I will never remember. I could have done with fewer details and more organization. Some details are very poignant and relevant, ( e.g., the incident with the baby with Down’s Sydrome) but others have little relevance and weigh the book down.

Recommendation

Eunice: The Kennedy Who Changed the World is good reading for people who are interested in history, the Kennedys, or issues surrounding women’s and children’s health. Just be prepared to skim every now and then (and don’t feel guilty about it!)

Have you read Eunice? What did you think? Can you recommend another interesting biography?

Thanks for getting nerdy with me!

What Does Prescient Mean?

prescient

I usually struggle with non-fiction. These days, I mostly read at night, for 15 minutes before fatigue takes over, and when I’m tired and sleepy, I don’t want facts and information. I want a good story!

But lately, I’m warming to non-fiction, especially biography and memoir. Perhaps I’ve stumbled upon some well written books. I also like how I learn new things from non-fiction. For example, my latest read, Eunice: The Kennedy Who Changed the World, has taught me much about 20th century history, the changing role of women, and the Kennedy family. (Did you know that JFK had EIGHT brothers and sisters? I didn’t- until now!)

It’s also taught me new vocabulary. According to Eileen McNamara, author of Eunice, Joe Kennedy (JFK’s father and the family patriarch) earned his fortune in the 1920s as a Wall Street speculator “with the help of insider information, not then illegal”. Kennedy “saw the crash coming and sold off his holdings in time. He got richer still by shorting stocks as prices fell and by buying up real estate at discounted prices in the aftermath of the crash. He had also been prescient about the movie industry.”

I didn’t know what prescient means, and I had to look it up.

prescient: \ ˈpre-sh(ē-)ən(t)\ from the Latin verb praescire, “to know beforehand”; having or showing awareness of and preparation for the future

Turns out, prescience is related to “science” (based on the Latin word for “to know”), and words like “omniscient” and “conscience”. Thank you, Merriam Webster.

Word Nerd Workout

Can you think of another word related to “science”? Or a synonym for prescience?

Wondrous Words Wednesday
Don’t forget to visit Kathy at Bermuda Onion for the WWW meme!

If you like learning new words, or learning about the meaning and history of words, join the Wondrous Words Wednesday meme at Bermuda Onion. Every Wednesday on Kathy’s blog, readers share new words they’ve learned or enjoy.

Thanks for getting nerdy with me!

Why You Should Put the Phone Away

Something must be up if the people who make the technology are encouraging us to use their technology less.

iPhone screen time
Screen time information can be found under settings

The current version of iOS on my iPhone has “Screen Time” settings. These are tools to help me decrease my use of certain apps and the phone in general. I set hours for “downtime” when almost all the app icons on my phone go dim, and if I try to open an app, I’m reminded not to use my phone. I can also set daily time limits for categories of apps, like “social media”, to make sure I don’t waste too much time scrolling through Facebook. Currently, my social media time limit is an hour, but I might change that to 30 minutes because…

A lot of people from a lot of different places are telling us that too much time with our phones isn’t good for us. We’re not just wasting time, we’re ruining our ability to concentrate and THINK. Here are a few things that have me reconsidering my relationship with my phone.

Brain Drain research

An article called “Brain Drain: The Mere Presence of One’s Own Smartphone Reduces Available Cognitive Capacity” describes interesting research on how phones affect concentration. According to the article, our smart phones interfere with our concentration because they are always present and are particularly good at attracting our attention. (Some studies show we respond to the sounds of our phone the same way we respond to the sound of our name!)

This is a problem, because every day we are bombarded with tons of environmental information, but we have limited cognitive ability (brain power) to process it. When our attention goes to our phones, even subconsciously, that further decreases our ability to think and process information.

The authors who conducted the Brain Drain research found the mere presence of a smart phone, even if it was turned off, face down, or silenced, decreased participants’ attention and decreased their performance on cognitive tasks. Based on these results, the researchers strongly recommend defined and protected periods of separation from smart phones to decrease interruptions and increase available cognitive capacity.

The point: If you are doing something important that requires focused thought, put your phone in another room so it doesn’t sap your precious brain power.

Researchers also suggest that using tools to limit, filter, and track smart phone use could decrease digital distraction. (Aha! The Screen Time settings are a good thing).

Deep Work by Cal NewportDeep Work

Cal Newport is an associate professor of computer science at Georgetown University. He also likes to study the impact of technology on society. His book, Deep Work, champions focused thinking in a noisy world.

In an interview with The New York Times, Newport explained some important concepts from Deep Work. First, “deep work” is focusing on an intellectually demanding task without any distractions. Newport says we need more of it. The term “attention residue” describes what happens when people switch focus between tasks. Every time we shift our attention, e.g. to check email, our ability to think and reason drops for a significant amount of time. If we constantly check apps and devices, we are living in a state of attention residue, and our mental capacity suffers. Finally, Newport says, concentration takes practice, and if we always attend to phone notifications and social media posts, we will never learn how to focus and think deeply.

“If you… always whip out your phone and bathe yourself in novel stimuli at the slightest hint of boredom… when it comes time to think deeply about something, your brain won’t tolerate it.” ~ Cal Newport

The point: Limit distractions so that you can train your brain to focus and work efficiently on important tasks. Make time for deep work.

Newport also recommends embracing boredom and quitting social media. He believes the cost of social media, in terms of distraction, outweighs the benefit, which is why he advocates Digital Minimalism (Which is the title of his book to be released February 2019.)

Technology is designed to be addictive

In an interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Harris, former Google product manager, spoke about smart phone design. According to Harris, smart phone apps and content are supposed to be habit forming so the consumers will use them for long periods of time. Harris said, “Inadvertently, whether they want to or not, [designers] are shaping the thoughts and feelings and actions of people…There’s always this narrative that technology’s neutral. And it’s up to us to choose how we use it. This is just not true.”

The point: Don’t let the technology companies hack your brain. Know how technology can help and harm you, and be smart about how you use it.

I really like certain things about my phone- Google Calendar, reminders, the ability to communicate easily with my child who is away at college. But more and more, I’m backing off phone use. I turn off my phone around nine and leave it in the kitchen overnight, and I don’t look at it the next day until I’ve done my morning devotion, stretched, and made the kids lunch. (Unless the weather is bad, and I need to know if school is canceled.)

I also try to “batch” things, like checking email and social media only at certain times of day, (e.g., over lunch), and I turn off notifications so that I’m choosing when to open apps, not the other way around. Also, I will put my phone on do not disturb or even in another room while I’m doing deep work (writing, reading, piano), so that I can FOCUS on important tasks.

How do you feel about your relationship with your smart phone? What do you do to keep that relationship “healthy”?

Thanks for getting nerdy with me!

 

 

 

 

 

 

What is Justice?

justice

We’ve heard the word “justice” thrown around a lot in the past year: racial justice, economic justice, social justice. There were confirmation hearings for Justice Kavanaugh, and cries for justice for victims of abuse and assault. And everyone is still wondering what’s going on with the Justice Department and its Mueller investigation.

Justice is a familiar word, embedded in the foundation of our country, and yet it represents an abstract concept.  What does justice really mean? Equality? Fairness?

Apparently, a lot of people wanted to know the answer to that question, because “justice” had the most look ups in 2018 at MerriamWebster.com. It also had a spike in look ups compared to 2017. For those reasons, Merriam Webster chose “justice” as its Word of the Year for 2018.

Which brings us back to the question, what does justice mean?
Justice comes from the Latin justus, from jus right or law, and it has several meanings, including:

  • the maintenance or administration of what is just especially by the impartial adjustment of conflicting claims or the assignment of merited rewards or punishments
  • a judge or supreme court justice
  • the administration of law
  • the quality of being just, impartial, or fair
  • the quality of conforming to law
  • conformity to truth, fact, or reason : CORRECTNESS

I’m glad people are looking up justice and pondering its meaning. We live in challenging times, when we are questioning ideas and patterns of behavior that have been accepted for many years. We need to ask these important questions, but what can guide us to the answers?

In America we have our law, the Constitution, for a standard, but the Constitution is open to interpretation. And look at that last definition for justice: “Conformity to truth, fact, or reason: correctness.” These days, thanks to the Internet and social media, opinion can be misunderstood as fact, truth can be relative, and reason sometimes gets lost among passionate beliefs. When we speak of justice, we must not only decide what conforms to “correctness”, but also determine what exactly “correctness” is.

Justice is not a word to toss around carelessly, and its meaning will definitely be tested in 2019.  I plan to watch carefully.  How about you?

Other popular look ups on the Merriam Webster site in 2018:

  • Nationalism-a sense of national consciousness exalting one nation above all others and placing primary emphasis on promotion of its culture and interests as opposed to those of other nations or supranational groups
  • Pansexual-of, relating to, or characterized by sexual desire or attraction that is not limited to people of a particular gender identity or sexual orientation; also : tending to suffuse all experience and conduct with erotic feeling
  • Lodestar– one that serves as an inspiration, model, or guide (used in reference to John McCain)
  • Excelsior– “higher” (motto of New York and sign off of famous comic book writer Stan Lee, who died in 2018)

What words from 2018 most interested you?  

Thanks for getting nerdy with me!

Why Do We Send Christmas Cards?

Every year, as I seek to shorten my list of Christmas to dos, and therefore limit my holiday exhaustion, I ponder The Christmas Card.  Is it worth coercing my people to pose for a picture?  And if yes, what should we wear?  Should I write a letter, or is a brief blurb on the back of the card enough?

The Christmas Card takes a lot of energy: assembling the family unit; enduring the grumbling; running between the tripod and the family huddle before the shutter timer goes off; designing the perfect photo card; choosing the perfect words.  And then there’s the mail merge  (I don’t print mailing labels enough; each year I must relearn the process) and the hours spent signing, stamping, sealing.

Christmas would be simpler without The Card.

I like to display my cards in the entrance to our dining room.

But I love GETTING cards.  I can’t wait to see how families and friends have grown and changed over the year.  I lament that in many cases, communication has been reduced to this annual ritual, and yet I’m thankful to at least have that.  I devour the letters that come with cards; I wish more did.

And so, every year,  I make the photo card and compose the letter.  I never use verse or acrostics (some people are very creative!), but write a family update, allowing one paragraph for each Tomiak.  I try to keep it real with snippets and quotes from our daily lives.  I avoid boasts and saccharine sweet sentiments. I hope to create something informative and entertaining.

This year, as if they heard my doubts, a few friends and family have made the time to tell me how much they love and look forward to my letter.  I appreciate the fact that in this busy world, at this busy time, if people make the effort to complement you, they usually mean it.

So The Christmas Card is a tradition I will keep.  Which of course leads to the Word Nerd question, how did the tradition of sending cards start?

Way back in 1843, in Victorian England, a man named Henry Cole had a problem: too many friends.  The custom of sending a Christmas letter had been around for a long time in England, but it got even more popular with the introduction of the “penny post”.  People could send a card or letter anywhere in the country for just one cent.  Mr. Cole didn’t want to neglect his duties of correspondence, but he simply didn’t have enough time to write everyone in his social circles.  So he had an idea.

Mr. Cole asked his friend J.C. Horsley, an artist, to create a Christmas illustration.  Cole printed that image on 5×3 inch pieces of cardboard with the generic greeting,  “A Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year to You.”  Cole could still personalize the postcard by writing a name at the top, but the bulk of the work was done, and the first Christmas Card was made.

The first Christmas card
The first Christmas card, designed by John Callcott Horsley for Henry Cole in 1843. Public Domain.

It took awhile for the tradition to catch on in the United States.  Louis Prang, a Prussian immigrant with a print shop near Boston, created the first Christmas card in the United States in 1875.  The custom didn’t truly get popular until 1915 when the founders of what would eventually become the Hallmark company introduced a new format for the card: bigger, folded like a book, mailed in an envelope.  The business boomed in the 1930s and 1950s and continues to be popular today.

It seems to me, we are going back to the original idea of a decorative post card.  Most of the cards I get are a single page, usually with a picture and a sentiment.  I love them, and I keep many displayed throughout the year as a reminder of friends and family who live far away.

If you’d like to learn more about the history of The Christmas Card, visit Smithsonian.com.

Do you send holiday cards?  What format do you prefer?  What do you do with the holiday cards you receive?

Happy Holidays!

 

 

 

 

 

 

Favorite Books of 2018

Thank you to everyone who contributed book ideas to my Favorite Books of 2018 list!  We now have a great selection of books to use for gift giving or just personal reading.  This year’s winner of the Favorite Books giveaway is Sara Gearheart!  Congratulations Sara!

Here is your list for 2018, with comments from readers in quotes.  We are heavy with historical fiction and memoir this year.  Click the links to read more about each book in Goodreads.  Enjoy!

Fiction

  • The Valentine Trilogy (Very Valentine; Brava, Valentine; The Supreme Macaroni Company)  by Adriana Trigiani

Fantasy

The Great AloneHistorical Fiction

  • America’s First Daughter by Stephanie Dray.  Well researched fiction about the life of Martha Jefferson, Thomas Jefferson’s daughter.  (My review here.)  “I loved First Daughter. It was fascinating to understand the role that Martha played in her father’s career. An amazing read!!”
  • Before We Were Yours by Lisa Wingate.  (Goodreads Choice Winner 2017).  “It is historical fiction based on the illegal activities of the Tennessee Children’s Home in the 1930’s-50’s. There are dual story lines – one in the 30’s and one current day. Some wonderful characters.”
  • The Great Alone by Kristin Hannah. (Goodreads Choice Award for historical fiction 2018) “The first book I’ve read that is set in Alaska. The 70s are my favorite decade so I like anything from that era.”
  • The Heart’s Invisible Furies by John Boyne. “Give yourself time to become immersed in the life of Cyril Avery, who is born to a teenage girl in rural Ireland and adopted by a wealthy couple in Dublin.  Each section of the book fast forwards seven years, so we meet Cyril’s mother, then Cyril at seven, 14, 21, and so on.  His story isn’t necessarily an extraordinary one, but it unfolds beautifully.  The writing is fabulous, the characters are magnificent, and it’s just the kind of book that settles in your heart and stays there.”
  • News of the World by Paulette Jiles.  From Goodreads: “In the aftermath of the Civil War, an aging itinerant news reader agrees to transport a young captive of the Kiowa back to her people in this exquisitely rendered, morally complex, multilayered novel of historical fiction… that explores the boundaries of family, responsibility, honor, and trust.”  Says the reader who contributed: “Brilliant.”
  • The Radium Girls: The Dark Story of America’s Shining Women by Kate Moore.  radium girlsA history of the women who worked in radium factories, the side effects they suffered, the regulations and research they inspired.  “Very different from anything I have ever read, and a piece of history I never knew existed. It was riveting, terrifying and fascinating all at the same time!”

Memoir

  • Shoe Dog by Phil Knight.  “Story of the creation and growth of Nike, including how they came up with the name and swoosh.  Mr. Knight is a runner that just wanted to make better running shoes.  A good read, a history story including high risk business decisions that turned out well for Nike.  The story moves along well.”
  • Becoming by Michelle Obama.  “It is really good. She shares her story and it really feels like she is the working mom next door. So many of the struggles and insecurities (I’m not sure if that is the best word…) she expresses are demons we all fight.”
  • Tell Me More by Kelly Corrigan (see my review here)
  • Educated by Tara Westover  (Goodreads Choice Award winner for memoir 2018) From Goodreads: “An unforgettable memoir in the tradition of The Glass Castle about a young girl who, kept out of school, leaves her survivalist family and goes on to earn a PhD from Cambridge University.”
  • QB: My Life Behind the Spiral by Steve Young.  From Goodreads: “In the most candid and compelling sports memoir since Andre Agassi’s riveting bestseller Open, former San Francisco 49er, Super Bowl champion, NFL MVP, and Hall of Famer Steve Young gives readers an unprecedented and stunning inside look at what it takes to become a super-elite professional quarterback.”

The Mighty DeadNon-fiction

  • The Mighty Dead: Why Homer Matters by Adam Nicolson  “It’s a broad take on the importance of the Illiad and Odyssey, alternating between a very personal view of the poems and a sweeping analysis of the book’s setting, language, historical accuracy, and who Homer may or may not have been.  It’s amazing how many echoes can be detected in these poems from an oral, tribal, oral world if you listen carefully enough.”
  • How We Decide by Jonah Lehrer.  “Great book that comes with some interesting controversy.”  (Lehrer was accused of making up Bob Dylan quotes).

Young Adult

  • The Hate U Give by Angie Thomas.  (Goodreads Choice Award winner 2017, young adult).  A great book about racism and awareness.  See my full review here.

What a great list!  Happy shopping and reading everyone!